ReviewSAGE open nursing
Nurses' Knowledge, Practice, and Associated Factors Regarding Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Catheter associated urinary tract infections remain among the most prevalent hospital-acquired infections. However, no pooled estimates of nurse's knowledge and practice towards catheter associated urinary tract infection prevention currently exist in Africa and Asia. Objective: To assess nurses' knowledge, practice and associated factors towards Catheter associated urinary tract infection prevention. Methods: The researchers conducted extensive search of institutional repositories, PubMed, Science Direct, Hinari, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the study. STATA 17 was used for data analysis, and funnel plot, Eggers test and meta-regression were used to examine publication bias and heterogeneity. Additionally, sensitivity analyses, and subgroup analysis were conducted. Studies on knowledge and practice toward catheter-associated urinary infection prevention among nurses were included and studies conducted other than nurses were excluded. A total of 8,647 articles were retrieved from online databases, of which only 21 articles were eligible for final analysis. Results: Nurses' overall CAUTI preventive knowledge (61%, I Conclusion: The knowledge and practice of catheter-associated urinary tract infection prevention among nurses in Africa and Asia were at a moderate level. However, significant regional disparities still exist, most likely due to variations in healthcare systems, resources, and research techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.