Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42523986›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2026

Factors affecting the viability of probiotics in various food products: a review of current knowledge.

Ilkin Sengun, Aysegul Kirmizigul Peker, Heena Sharma, Nikheel Bhojraj Rathod, Tanaji G Kudre, Andrzej Szymkowiak, Piotr Kulawik, Giulia Tabanelli, Duygu Ağagündüz, Ferenc Budán and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ilkin SengunFood Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Ege University, Izmir, Bornova, Türkiye.
Aysegul Kirmizigul PekerFood Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Ege University, Izmir, Bornova, Türkiye.
Heena SharmaFood Technology Lab, Dairy Technology Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India.
Nikheel Bhojraj RathodDepartment of Meat and Marine Sciences, CSIR-Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysuru, India.
Tanaji G KudreDepartment of Meat and Marine Sciences, CSIR-Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysuru, India.
Andrzej SzymkowiakDepartment of Commerce and Marketing, Institute of Marketing, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poznań, Poland.
Piotr KulawikDepartment of Animal Products Technology, Faculty of Food Technology, University of Agriculture, Kraków, Poland.
Giulia TabanelliDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Duygu AğagündüzDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Ferenc BudánMedical School, Institute of Physiology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Fatih OzogulDepartment of Seafood Processing Technology, Faculty of Fisheries, Cukurova University, Adana, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review comparatively evaluates the quantitative effects of non-thermal processing technologies on probiotic survival, metabolic stability, and functional performance across different strains and food matrices. A literature search identified relevant peer-reviewed studies, from which eligible original research articles were included for detailed synthesis. Recent quantitative evidence indicates that non-thermal technologies can enhance probiotic viability and functionality under controlled conditions. For example, ultrasound-assisted fermentation in a millet-based probiotic beverage containing

Indexed as

fermented foodsfood functionalitymicroencapsulationnon-thermal technologiesprobiotic viability

Identifiers

PMID42523986
PMCPMC13408264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.