ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Educational escape games in emotion education: effects on learning achievement, emotion regulation strategies, and achievement emotions among upper elementary students.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Upper elementary students face increasing social-emotional challenges during early adolescence, yet traditional lecture-based emotion education may provide limited opportunities for situated emotional practice. Although game-based learning has been widely used to enhance motivation and cognitive outcomes, the effects of educational escape games (EEGs) on emotion regulation strategies and achievement emotions remain insufficiently understood. Methods: This study used a quasi-experimental mixed-methods design to examine the effects of integrating EEGs into an emotion education curriculum on fifth-grade students' learning achievement, self-reported emotion regulation strategies, and self-reported achievement emotions. Participants were 56 fifth-grade students from two intact classes at an elementary school in southern Taiwan. One class received a 6-week emotion education curriculum integrated with EEGs, whereas the other received teacher-guided questioning and explanation based on the same curriculum content. Quantitative data were collected through pretests and posttests and analyzed using paired-samples t-tests and ANCOVA. Qualitative data, including classroom observations and a focus group interview with seven students from the experimental group, were analyzed using framework analysis to contextualize the quantitative findings. Results: After controlling for pretest scores, the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher curriculum-based learning achievement than the control group. However, no significant short-term changes were found in students' self-reported cognitive reappraisal or expressive suppression. Regarding achievement emotions, the experimental group reported higher anxiety and lower enjoyment after the intervention. Qualitative findings suggested that students' anxiety was mainly related to time pressure, puzzle difficulty, and uncertainty, and was often accompanied by continued participation, peer discussion, and problem-solving attempts rather than withdrawal. Discussion: These findings should be interpreted cautiously because a shortened achievement emotions measure was used and the anxiety subscale showed low internal consistency. Overall, EEGs may provide a high-challenge, highly engaging context for emotion education, but game-based learning does not necessarily increase enjoyment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.