Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42523961›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Probing the linguistic cerebellum: a qualitative review of the effects of cerebellar neurostimulation on language processing.

Sabrina Turker, Gesa Hartwigsen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sabrina TurkerBrain and Language Lab, Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gesa HartwigsenResearch Group Cognition and Plasticity, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebellum has historically been underrepresented in language research. However, converging evidence from lesion and neuroimaging studies supports its crucial involvement in phonological and semantic aspects of language processing, highlighting the relevance of cerebro-cerebellar circuits in language-related functions. Likewise, cerebellar neurostimulation has emerged as a promising tool for modulating sensorimotor and higher-order cognitive processes. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science following PRISMA guidelines and the present review synthesizes findings from 30 neurostimulation studies probing the causal role of the cerebellum for language processing. It summarizes transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation studies in neurotypical speakers and readers, and individuals with higher-order language disorders. Special emphasis is placed on studies combining cerebellar stimulation with behavioral interventions to assess the potential of improving language-related outcomes in clinical populations. Collectively, these studies support the role of the right posterolateral cerebellum as a key modulator of language functions, especially meaning-related operations.

Indexed as

cerebellumlanguageneurostimulationnon-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS)readingreviewtDCSTMS

Identifiers

PMID42523961
PMCPMC13408518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.