ArticleDigital health
Designing digital health interventions for opioid use disorder: Perspectives on iENDURE.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: iENDURE is an eight-week, combined computer and text-messaging intervention, designed to augment medication-based treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) by enhancing motivation to engage in treatment/recovery and promoting tolerance of distress. The present study examines participants' experience using iENDURE. Methods: Adults engaged in outpatient buprenorphine treatment were recruited as part of a larger randomized controlled trial and completed semi-structured interviews with trained study team members. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed by a professional agency. The transcripts were coded into a consensus framework matrix by two authors. Results: iENDURE was well-received by participants, who enjoyed receiving the motivational reminders and daily questions. Engagement with certain features was highly dependent on participants' recovery stage. Nearly half of the sample highlighted the program's ease of use. Further, offering daily skill recommendations through a text-message format allowed for easy access to evidence-based content. All participants but one (29/30) completed the eight-week intervention. Half the sample engaged with iENDURE each day, and the daily provision of support was deemed by most participants as their favorite part of iENDURE. Conclusions: Overall, participants were receptive to the iENDURE intervention as a daily digital supplement to their treatment plans. Recommendations for further optimization and refinement include: personalization in content and delivery structure, accessibility in engagement recommendations, and ease of use of the intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.