ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
An RQMN Integrated Teaching Model to Improve Clinical Competence in Undergraduate Internal Medicine Education: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Integrating theoretical instruction with the development of clinical reasoning and practical competence remains a challenge in internal medicine education. This study evaluated an integrated teaching model designed to facilitate the transfer of classroom learning to clinical practice in undergraduate medical education. Methods: Eighty undergraduate medical students were randomly assigned to an RQMN group receiving the RQMN integrated teaching model-a structured sequence of role playing, question raising, making diagnostic and therapeutic plans, and novice clinical apprenticeship through supervised clerkship-or a control group receiving conventional instruction. Outcomes were assessed immediately after completion of the course and clinical clerkship using a comprehensive clinical competence evaluation and a structured questionnaire on learning experience and teaching quality. Results: No significant difference was observed in theoretical examination scores between the groups. However, the RQMN group performed significantly better in several practice-oriented domains, including medical history taking, physical examination, communication skills, clinical judgment, and medical record writing (all Conclusion: The RQMN integrated teaching model was associated with short-term improvements in selected clinical skills and self-reported learning experiences immediately after course completion, while theoretical examination performance was maintained. Further studies with delayed follow-up are needed to determine whether these gains are retained and transferred to later clinical performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.