ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2026
A theoretical and experimental framework enables low-coverage sequencing for accurate quantification of genome-wide cytosine modification levels.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic sequence context differentially impacts stepwise oxidation by TET enzymes to shape DNA hydroxymethylation landscapes.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Low Depth Epigenetic Mapping of Maturation Versus Retrodifferentiation in HepaRG Cells.Epigenomes · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
5-methylcytosine (5mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) regulate gene expression and exhibit dynamic levels during development and disease. While high-depth, base-resolution studies offer the most detailed view of epigenetic landscapes, many open questions are answered by surveying changes in 5mC/5hmC levels across larger cohorts. Nonetheless, current global quantification methods, including mass spectrometry, are typically limited in accessibility, accuracy, or throughput. Here, to evaluate the viability of low-coverage sequencing as an alternative, we first computationally downsampled deeply sequenced data to resolve the three-way relationship between sequencing coverage, modification levels, and measurement error. This relationship allowed us to develop a facile online tool for error calculation and to define experimental targets: <0.24% genome coverage can quantify 5mC and low-abundance 5hmC with minimal and predictable errors (<5%). Importantly, in direct comparisons, low-depth sequencing (Sparse-Seq) demonstrated high accuracy and less variability than mass spectrometry, while distinctively preserving genomic context. Applied serially to developing mouse brains, Sparse-Seq revealed an earlier emergence of 5hmCpG compared to 5mCpH and uncovered previously overlooked, genomic feature-specific epigenetic changes. This work establishes a rigorous foundation for employing Sparse-Seq as a highly accessible approach for 5mC/5hmC quantification, enabling economical first-pass analysis of epigenetic landscapes suited for large cohort studies and new hypothesis generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.