ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Speaking up under constraints: a configurational JD-R explanation of safety voice among young construction workers.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Young construction workers are exposed to high levels of occupational safety risk while often occupying relatively vulnerable positions in work groups. Safety voice is an important participatory mechanism for early hazard identification and occupational injury prevention. However, existing studies have mainly examined the net effects of individual predictors, offering limited insight into how multiple job demands, job resources, and personal capabilities combine to enable or constrain safety voice. Methods: Drawing on the job demands-resources framework, this study adopted a configurational perspective to examine how different combinations of job insecurity, perceived voice cost, psychological safety, safety empowering supervision, job control, and political skill are associated with high and low safety voice among young construction workers. Survey data from 240 young construction workers in China were analyzed using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Results: The findings reveal multiple configurations leading to high safety voice, indicating that no single condition is sufficient on its own. Instead, safety voice emerges when motivational permission, behavioral discretion, supervisory support, and interpersonal capability are jointly present or compensate for selected demand-side constraints. The configurations associated with low safety voice are not simple opposites of those producing high safety voice, suggesting clear causal asymmetry. Discussion: This study extends occupational safety and public health research by showing how safety voice among young construction workers depends on configurations of work-related demands, resources, and personal capabilities. The findings provide practical implications for injury prevention, participatory safety management, and workplace health promotion in high-risk construction settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.