ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Implementing Integrated Behavioral Health (IBH) in a Resident-Led Primary Care Clinic: A Single Institutional Experience and Analysis of Trainee Perspectives.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Integrated Behavioral Health (IBH) describes a model for providing mental health care within the context of a primary care practice. However, there is little data on how to implement IBH into practice, particularly within the context of a training environment, such as residency. Objective: Our objectives were to describe our model for IBH, embedded within an internal medicine resident primary care clinic at a tertiary academic center, and assess trainee perspectives of IBH. Methods: Surveys and semi-structured interviews were conducted with trainees and attendings in internal medicine and psychiatry between June 2023 to June 2025. Survey responses included both likert ratings and free text responses. In total, 28/55 (50.9%) medicine residents and 8/9 (88.9%) psychiatry trainees were surveyed. We interviewed 6 medicine residents, 2 psychiatry trainees and 1 psychiatry attending. Results: Over 85% of surveyed medicine residents reported greater confidence in treating mental health conditions after participation in IBH, and 100% of trainees reported that IBH improved patient care and facilitated effective communication as part of an inter-disciplinary team. Interviews with trainees and faculty revealed that participants highly valued the educational curriculum of IBH with a desire for future curricular development around difficult to diagnose conditions, such as functional disorders. Conclusions: IBH can help address gaps in mental healthcare within the community, while also improving the education of trainees in medicine and psychiatry. Through this descriptive analysis, we hope to share our experience and provide a practical guide to implementing IBH programs at other institutions and improve access to high-quality mental healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.