ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
A case series: thirty-three cases with heterotopic pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study was designed to explore the impacts of clinical features, surgical timing, embryo transfer type, and ectopic pregnancy location on intrauterine pregnancy outcomes among heterotopic pregnancy patients, with the goal of offering evidence-based guidance for clinical management. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 33 patients with clinically diagnosed heterotopic pregnancy admitted to our center between June 2019 and September 2025. Result: This study included 33 patients with heterotopic pregnancy one conceived after ovulation induction and 32 via Conclusion: Ultrasonic indicators reflecting the development of the intrauterine gestational sac, such as the timing of yolk sac and fetal heartbeat visualization, and crown-rump length, were significantly superior to those of the ectopic gestational sac, indicating a favorable prognosis for the intrauterine pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.