Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42523866›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

A case series: thirty-three cases with heterotopic pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology.

Xinyang Li, Han Zhang, Qi Xi, Ninglu Yuan, Di Su, Linlin Liu, Zhuo Li, Jiayi Tian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xinyang LiDepartment of Prenatal Diagnosis and Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Han ZhangDepartment of Prenatal Diagnosis and Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Qi XiDepartment of Prenatal Diagnosis and Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Ninglu YuanDepartment of Prenatal Diagnosis and Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Di SuDepartment of Prenatal Diagnosis and Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Linlin LiuDepartment of Prenatal Diagnosis and Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Zhuo LiDepartment of Prenatal Diagnosis and Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jiayi TianDepartment of Prenatal Diagnosis and Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study was designed to explore the impacts of clinical features, surgical timing, embryo transfer type, and ectopic pregnancy location on intrauterine pregnancy outcomes among heterotopic pregnancy patients, with the goal of offering evidence-based guidance for clinical management. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 33 patients with clinically diagnosed heterotopic pregnancy admitted to our center between June 2019 and September 2025. Result: This study included 33 patients with heterotopic pregnancy one conceived after ovulation induction and 32 via Conclusion: Ultrasonic indicators reflecting the development of the intrauterine gestational sac, such as the timing of yolk sac and fetal heartbeat visualization, and crown-rump length, were significantly superior to those of the ectopic gestational sac, indicating a favorable prognosis for the intrauterine pregnancy.

Indexed as

ectopic pregnancyheterotopic pregnancyintrauterine pregnancypregnancy outcomesac development

Identifiers

PMID42523866
PMCPMC13408029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.