Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42523854›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Feasibility and acceptability of using experience sampling method to assess daily grief reactions in Viet Nam.

Hung Nguyen, Huy Hoang Le, Clare Killikelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hung NguyenDepartment of Psychology, Division of Clinical Intervention and Global Mental Health, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Huy Hoang LeDepartment of Psychology, Division of Clinical Intervention and Global Mental Health, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0483-3566
Clare KillikellyDepartment of Psychology, Division of Clinical Intervention and Global Mental Health, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2661-4521

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The Experience Sampling Method (ESM) delivered via smartphone applications offers a scalable approach to monitoring mental health in daily life. However, its feasibility and acceptability in low- and middle-income countries remain largely unexplored. This study provides the first evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of app-based grief monitoring among bereaved adults in Viet Nam. Methods: Ninety-six bereaved adults completed a two-week ESM protocol involving five daily prompts assessing momentary grief experiences and contextual factors. Feasibility was evaluated through compliance rates, while acceptability was assessed using participants' ratings of perceived personal benefit, emotional reactivity, and perceived need for professional support after completing two weeks of ESM. Results: The overall compliance rate was 73%, indicating good feasibility. Participants reported neutral to mildly positive perceptions of personal benefit and mildly negative to neutral levels of emotional reactivity. On average, participants did not endorse a need for professional help resulting from study participation. Neither sociodemographic characteristics nor baseline grief scores were associated with compliance. Higher baseline grief intensity was significantly associated with greater perceived need for professional help, lower emotional reactivity, and lower overall acceptability. Conclusion: App-based ESM is a feasible and generally acceptable method for monitoring daily grief experiences among bereaved adults in Viet Nam. Further research is needed to optimize digital grief assessment and support the broader implementation of ESM in low- and middle-income settings.

Indexed as

appsdigital healthmental healthmHealthoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID42523854
PMCPMC13408057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.