ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2026
Billing and Coding Rounds: Turning Daily Encounters Into Dollars and Sense.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While hospitalists dedicate substantial time to documentation, incomplete or inaccurate coding causes large, preventable revenue losses. Recent updates to evaluation and management guidelines allow visit level to be determined by either the complexity of medical decision-making or total clinician time, including documentation. However, limited training means physicians may underutilize these updates, contributing to financial shortfalls. Methods: A 5-part curriculum delivered in 15-minute virtual sessions over 6 months was designed to improve documentation, billing accuracy, and reimbursement without adding work for faculty. It combined brief didactics with interactive cases or "billing rounds," an electronic health record smart phrase, a concise reference "cheat sheet," and targeted feedback to the lowest performers. Pre- and postcurriculum surveys and billing data analysis measured changes in confidence and objective performance. Results: Fifty-six hospitalists participated (42.9% completed presurvey and 37.5% postsurvey). Respondents reported increased confidence in billing from pre- to postcurriculum. The proportion reporting Discussion: This curriculum led to gains in documentation quality and reimbursement, demonstrating that tightly targeted, workflow-embedded billing education can close key revenue-integrity gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.