Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42523781›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Nurses' AI training acceptance and tool usage: a structural equation model of individual and hospital-level factors.

Linli Guo, Qin Ding, Mengjie Tang, Siyun Wei, Limei Chen, Xiaotao Cao, Xiaoxia Zhang, Zuli Zheng

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Linli Guo *Department of Clinical Trial Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Qin Ding *Department of Mental Health Center, National Center for Mental Disorders, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Mengjie TangDepartment of Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Siyun WeiDepartment of Mental Health Center, National Center for Mental Disorders, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Limei ChenKey Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Department of Pediatrics Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xiaotao CaoDepartment of Clinical Trial Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xiaoxia ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining, China.
Zuli ZhengDepartment of Women and Child Psychiatry, The Second People's Hospital of Guizhou Province, Guiyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), it has exerted a profound influence on the medical field. Currently, AI applications in nursing remain nascent in China. This study aimed to investigate nurses' attitudes and anxiety levels toward AI in general hospitals in western China, and to analyze the association of these psychological factors with their AI training acceptance and clinical AI tool usage behavior. Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional design was employed. In February 2026, a questionnaire survey was conducted among 620 registered nurses in public general hospitals across western China (Sichuan, Guizhou, and Qinghai provinces). The questionnaire collected data on nurses' demographic information, whether they had received AI training and whether they had used AI tools in the workplace, as well as their responses to the General Attitudes Toward AI Scale (GAAIS) and the AI Anxiety Scale (AIAS). Participation was voluntary and anonymous. Descriptive statistics, reliability and validity testing, correlation analysis, and structural equation modeling were performed using R software (version 4.5.1). Results: Of 603 returned questionnaires (97.3% response rate), 591 were valid. Negative attitudes were significantly associated with lower training acceptance ( Conclusion: Hospital-level resources, older age, and longer work experience were the factors most strongly associated with nurses' AI training acceptance and AI tool usage, with work experience showing the strongest association with tool usage. Negative attitudes were associated with lower engagement in both outcomes, whereas positive attitudes and anxiety showed no significant independent associations. These findings suggest that institutional support, experience-based peer learning, and targeted reduction of negative perceptions may be key priorities for AI integration in nursing practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAttitude of Health PersonnelNursing Staff, HospitalAdultAnxietyAttitude to ComputersChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitals, GeneralHumansLatent Class AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesanxietyartificial intelligenceattitudehospitaltool usagetraining acceptance

Identifiers

PMID42523781
PMCPMC13407972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.