ArticleBioinformatics advances2026
Generation of peptide detectability datasets from single DIA experiment for prediction model fine-tuning.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Accurate prediction of peptide detectability in mass spectrometry-based proteomics is critical for improving both protein identification and quantification. Current models generally estimate detectability from amino acid sequences; however, peptide detectability is influenced by the instruments, acquisition methods, and experimental conditions, limiting the applicability of sequence-based models. State-of-the-art approaches mitigate this issue by fine-tuning models for each experimental setup, yet this strategy demands extensive training datasets-often comprising up to 300 000 peptides-incurring substantial experimental and computational costs. Results: In this study, we present a complementary approach for generating peptide detectability datasets directly from a single DIA experiment. These datasets enable fine-tuning of prediction models with minimal raw data, while improving adaptation to specific experimental conditions. This strategy substantially reduces both the data and cost requirements typically associated with model training. Furthermore, we show that filtering search libraries based on predicted detectability increases peptide identification rates and decreases computational time. Availability and implementation: Code is available on https://github.com/leoschn/Detectability. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier https://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org/cgi/GetDataset?ID=PXD076276PXD076276.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.