Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42523693›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2026

Tracheostomy Decannulation Practices in Indian Intensive Care Units: A National Cross-sectional Survey of Intensive Care Unit Consultants.

Anirban Bhattacharjee, Ankur Khandelwal, Dalim K Baidya, Mohan Gurjar, Reshu Gupta, Habib Md R Karim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anirban BhattacharjeeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Guwahati, Assam, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7657-7450
Ankur KhandelwalDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Guwahati, Assam, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7915-9158
Dalim K BaidyaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7811-7039
Mohan GurjarDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8489-0324
Reshu GuptaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Health City Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1570-4337
Habib Md R KarimDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Guwahati, Assam, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6632-0491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Tracheostomy is performed in 10-20% of critically ill patients. Once the underlying indication is resolved, the next critical step is decannulation. There is a paucity of data on decannulation approaches adopted in Indian intensive care units (ICUs). This survey assessed the current tracheostomy decannulation practices in Indian ICUs: "Respiratory readiness" for decannulation, use of corking trials or downsizing, pre-decannulation assessments, and post-decannulation care. Patients and methods: An online 15-item questionnaire-based survey was conducted among ICU consultants with ≥3 years of post-qualification experience across India. Results: Three hundred unique responses were collected across India. The respondents demonstrated marked heterogeneity across all assessed domains. For respiratory readiness, 72% decannulated on minimal oxygen via T-piece or heat and moisture exchanger (HME), whereas 33% withheld decannulation if any oxygen was required. Regarding methodology, 36% performed direct decannulation, 35% employed capping trials, and 28.7% preferred gradual downsizing. Only 59.7% performed routine swallowing assessment decannulation, with clinical bedside evaluation predominating over objective methods. Conclusion: There is marked practice variation in decannulation approaches and an urgent need for evidence-based decannulation protocols in Indian ICUs.

Indexed as

Airway managementCritical careDecannulationTracheostomyWeaning

Identifiers

PMID42523693
PMCPMC13407472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.