ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2026
Tracheostomy Decannulation Practices in Indian Intensive Care Units: A National Cross-sectional Survey of Intensive Care Unit Consultants.
Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Tracheostomy is performed in 10-20% of critically ill patients. Once the underlying indication is resolved, the next critical step is decannulation. There is a paucity of data on decannulation approaches adopted in Indian intensive care units (ICUs). This survey assessed the current tracheostomy decannulation practices in Indian ICUs: "Respiratory readiness" for decannulation, use of corking trials or downsizing, pre-decannulation assessments, and post-decannulation care. Patients and methods: An online 15-item questionnaire-based survey was conducted among ICU consultants with ≥3 years of post-qualification experience across India. Results: Three hundred unique responses were collected across India. The respondents demonstrated marked heterogeneity across all assessed domains. For respiratory readiness, 72% decannulated on minimal oxygen via T-piece or heat and moisture exchanger (HME), whereas 33% withheld decannulation if any oxygen was required. Regarding methodology, 36% performed direct decannulation, 35% employed capping trials, and 28.7% preferred gradual downsizing. Only 59.7% performed routine swallowing assessment decannulation, with clinical bedside evaluation predominating over objective methods. Conclusion: There is marked practice variation in decannulation approaches and an urgent need for evidence-based decannulation protocols in Indian ICUs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.