Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42523646›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

A mixed-methods inquiry into teacher authenticity, psychological capital, identity, and engagement using critical case analysis.

Lezhi Xiong, Yawen Liu, Zhiqi Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lezhi XiongSchool of Marxism, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, China.
Yawen LiuSchool of Marxism, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.
Zhiqi WeiSchool of Marxism, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Grounded in the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model, this study investigates the relationships between teacher authenticity, professional identity, psychological capital (PsyCap), and work engagement within mainland China's educational system, focusing on K-12 teachers ( Methods: Employing an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, the quantitative phase utilized structural equation modeling (SEM) to test a hypothesized mediation model. A subsequent qualitative phase ( Results: Quantitative findings demonstrated that authenticity and professional identity significantly predict work engagement, both directly and indirectly through PsyCap, which emerged as a robust mediator (authenticity total effect Discussion: These results suggest that while authenticity and identity are vital personal resources, their efficacy in driving engagement is moderated by the institutional context. The study offers nuanced implications for fostering teacher well-being within high-stakes educational environments.

Indexed as

critical case analysismediationmixed methodsprofessional identitypsychological capitalteacher authenticityteacher well-beingwork engagement

Identifiers

PMID42523646
PMCPMC13407303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.