Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42523632›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

How does capital endowment affect dietary quality in rural elderly? Evidence from Heilongjiang Province, China.

Yanzhi Hao, Caixia Li, Zengjin Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yanzhi HaoInstitute of Agricultural Science and Technology Information, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Caixia LiSchool of Business, Sanda University, Shanghai, China.
Zengjin LiuInstitute of Agricultural Science and Technology Information, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Amidst rapid demographic aging and hollowed-out family structures in rural China, the dietary quality of older adults has become a critical social concern, reflecting broader challenges in family support and resource allocation. This study investigates how capital endowment-comprising human, social, financial, and physical dimensions-influences the dietary quality of the rural elderly. Methods: Using 2022 survey data from 1,256 individuals in Heilongjiang Province, we constructed a multi-dimensional capital endowment index and employed a Tobit model to analyze its impact on dietary quality, which was measured by the Dietary Balance Index (DBI). Results: The results indicate that capital endowment significantly improves dietary quality, with human capital exhibiting the strongest positive effect. The relationships between specific capital types and dietary imbalance are nonlinear: financial capital shows a U-shaped association, while physical capital follows an inverted U-shaped pattern. Subgroup analyses further reveal that only human and social capital mitigate severe dietary imbalances, and the capital dependencies differ significantly between low- and high-income groups. Discussion and conclusion: These findings suggest that tailored, multi-dimensional policy interventions are necessary to address the complex and heterogeneous pathways through which capital endowment shapes dietary outcomes. This study offers crucial insights for promoting healthy aging and improving nutritional well-being among rural older adults in China.

Indexed as

capital endowmentdietary qualityHeilongjiang Provincenonlinear relationshiprural elderly

Identifiers

PMID42523632
PMCPMC13407291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.