Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42523630›Full record

Articlenpj climate action2026

Radical climate protests shaped portrayals of moderate activists and reader attitudes in German news media.

Lukas Mayrhofer, Simon Fassnacht, Markus Foramitti, Jana K Köhler, Boryana Todorova, Claus Lamm, Mauricio Martins

Abstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in npj climate action, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lukas MayrhoferSocial, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Unit, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Simon FassnachtMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Markus ForamittiDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jana K KöhlerEnvironmental Psychology, Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Boryana TodorovaSocial, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Unit, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Claus LammSocial, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Unit, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Mauricio MartinsSocial, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Unit, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radical climate protests have been theorized to shape perceptions of moderate climate groups, a dynamic known as the radical flank effect (RFE). We examine this phenomenon through a longitudinal analysis of German media discourse on climate protests. Using validated large language model prompts, we annotated stances and anger in 2376 news articles and 225,121 user comments covering the moderate activist group Fridays for Future (FFF) and the more radical Last Generation (LG). Short-term increases in LG protest coverage were associated with increased support for FFF in news articles and left-leaning outlets' user comments, but with decreased support in right-leaning comments. However, these patterns were not observed over longer time periods. Although anger expressed in the general coverage of climate protests impacted subsequent support for FFF, this effect was not specific to coverage of radical protests. These findings highlight the temporally bounded and ideologically contingent nature of RFEs in media discourse.

Indexed as

Environmental social sciencesPsychology

Identifiers

PMID42523630
PMCPMC13407165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.