Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42523613›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

A Controlled in Silico Benchmark for GNN Prediction of Tissue Dynamics.

Matej Krajnc, Troy Comi, Siqi Miao, Adnan Hafeez, Hadar Serviansky, Pan Li, Tomer Stern

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matej KrajncDepartment of Theoretical Physics, Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Troy ComiThe Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Siqi MiaoSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Adnan HafeezAdvanced Research Computing, Information and Technology Services, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Hadar ServianskyDepartment of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Pan LiSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Tomer SternDepartment of Biologic and Materials Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

Uncovering Morphogenetic Modularity with Data ScienceR35GM162152 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Tomer Stern · 2026 to 2026
$401k
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM162152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are promising tools for predicting tissue dynamics, but choosing the right architecture remains difficult because experimental datasets are limited, noisy, and system-specific. We introduce a controlled in silico benchmark for comparing GNN architectures on a vertex-model task: predicting relaxed cell-cell interface lengths after a cell neighbor exchange. Because simulated data provide known ground truth, we can vary tissue geometry, mechanics, perturbation complexity, dataset size, and input features independently. Provably Powerful Graph Networks (PPGN) and Principal Neighborhood Aggregation (PNA) were most sample-efficient when pre-event edge lengths were provided, whereas performance dropped sharply with topology alone. We also revealed a predict-or-copy strategy, whereby predictions far from the exchange copied pre-event lengths instead of predicting long-range changes. Prediction was harder in disordered tissues, suggesting hexagonality as a simple indicator of difficulty. These results provide a reproducible testbed for diagnosing feature dependence, copying behavior, and geometric consistency in tissue-remodeling prediction.

Identifiers

PMID42523613
PMCPMC13405519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.