ArticleResearch square2026
A Controlled in Silico Benchmark for GNN Prediction of Tissue Dynamics.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are promising tools for predicting tissue dynamics, but choosing the right architecture remains difficult because experimental datasets are limited, noisy, and system-specific. We introduce a controlled in silico benchmark for comparing GNN architectures on a vertex-model task: predicting relaxed cell-cell interface lengths after a cell neighbor exchange. Because simulated data provide known ground truth, we can vary tissue geometry, mechanics, perturbation complexity, dataset size, and input features independently. Provably Powerful Graph Networks (PPGN) and Principal Neighborhood Aggregation (PNA) were most sample-efficient when pre-event edge lengths were provided, whereas performance dropped sharply with topology alone. We also revealed a predict-or-copy strategy, whereby predictions far from the exchange copied pre-event lengths instead of predicting long-range changes. Prediction was harder in disordered tissues, suggesting hexagonality as a simple indicator of difficulty. These results provide a reproducible testbed for diagnosing feature dependence, copying behavior, and geometric consistency in tissue-remodeling prediction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.