ArticleResearch square2026
Identifying cognitive impairment in older adults using machine learning on combined fNIRS and motion data during an upper extremity dual task function.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is critical that dementia clinical interventions begin early in the disease progression to be effective. Similar clinical manifestations may be observed in both cognitively healthy older adults and older adults with early-stage cognitive impairment, posing a challenge for early disease identification. This study explored classification models using a combination of motor-(gyroscope) and brain- (functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)) based features for potential use in screening cognitive impairment in older adults. Cognitively normal older adults (CNOA, n = 43; age = 75.47 ± 7.15) and cognitively impaired older adults (CIOA, n = 32; age = 75.90 ± 7.48) completed a 3-minute resting period followed by 3-minute upper extremity dual task function (UEF) involving simultaneous serial subtraction and elbow flexion. The selected features included motor variability and fNIRS anterior prefrontal cortex connectivity outcomes. Logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), and bootstrap aggregated decision trees predicted the cognitive classification of participants. Cross-validation results suggest SVM models had superior performance with an average accuracy of 76%, Receiver Operating Characteristic - Area Under Curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.86, and F1 score of 69. When used with classification algorithms, the UEF dual task may offer an objective technique for early dementia identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.