Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42523567›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Identifying cognitive impairment in older adults using machine learning on combined fNIRS and motion data during an upper extremity dual task function.

Kelsi Petrillo, Nima Toosizadeh

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kelsi PetrilloDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Sciences, School of Health Professions, Rutgers University, 65 Bergen St, Newark, NJ 07107.
Nima ToosizadehDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Sciences, School of Health Professions, Rutgers University, 65 Bergen St, Newark, NJ 07107.

Funding

Heart Rate Dynamics in Response to Upper-Extremity Function Test to Identify Irreversible Frailty After Invasive Therapy in Older Adults with Advanced Heart DiseaseR01AG076774 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Nima Toosizadeh · 2023 to 2026
$1.3M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG076774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is critical that dementia clinical interventions begin early in the disease progression to be effective. Similar clinical manifestations may be observed in both cognitively healthy older adults and older adults with early-stage cognitive impairment, posing a challenge for early disease identification. This study explored classification models using a combination of motor-(gyroscope) and brain- (functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)) based features for potential use in screening cognitive impairment in older adults. Cognitively normal older adults (CNOA, n = 43; age = 75.47 ± 7.15) and cognitively impaired older adults (CIOA, n = 32; age = 75.90 ± 7.48) completed a 3-minute resting period followed by 3-minute upper extremity dual task function (UEF) involving simultaneous serial subtraction and elbow flexion. The selected features included motor variability and fNIRS anterior prefrontal cortex connectivity outcomes. Logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), and bootstrap aggregated decision trees predicted the cognitive classification of participants. Cross-validation results suggest SVM models had superior performance with an average accuracy of 76%, Receiver Operating Characteristic - Area Under Curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.86, and F1 score of 69. When used with classification algorithms, the UEF dual task may offer an objective technique for early dementia identification.

Indexed as

dementiadual taskfNIRSmachine learningmotor variabilityresting state

Identifiers

PMID42523567
PMCPMC13405476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.