ArticleResearch square2026
Interpretable Machine Learning Enables Preoperative Physiologic Risk Stratification for Dysphagia After Anti-Reflux Surgery.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Postoperative dysphagia remains one of the most clinically significant complications following anti-reflux surgery, yet existing preoperative risk stratification approaches incompletely integrate esophageal motility, reflux burden, and esophagogastric junction biomechanics. We developed an interpretable machine learning framework integrating multimodal physiologic and clinical data to predict new-onset postoperative dysphagia and translate these relationships into a clinically deployable risk score. Following screening of 878 consecutive patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery at a high-volume tertiary referral center, 428 patients met inclusion criteria and underwent multimodal preoperative physiologic assessment including high-resolution manometry, EndoFLIP impedance planimetry, Bravo pH monitoring, and GERD-HRQL evaluation. Patients were divided into derivation (n = 362) and independent holdout validation (n = 66) cohorts. An ensemble machine learning framework integrating logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, and support vector machine models was developed using engineered higher-order physiologic interaction features and subsequently translated into an interpretable point-based scoring system. The ensemble model demonstrated strong discrimination in the derivation cohort (AUC = 0.91, accuracy = 80.9%, sensitivity = 86.2%, specificity = 75.7%) with preserved performance in the independent holdout cohort (AUC = 0.72, balanced accuracy = 68.7%, sensitivity = 70.0%, specificity = 67.4%). Interaction features integrating reflux burden, esophageal contractility, distensibility, and patient-level modifiers demonstrated greater predictive utility than isolated physiologic variables alone. The resulting cumulative risk score enabled stratification into distinct postoperative dysphagia susceptibility groups across both derivation and validation cohorts and was deployed as an open-source web-based calculator for individualized risk estimation. These findings demonstrate that integrated multimodal esophageal physiology combined with interpretable machine learning enables clinically meaningful prediction of postoperative dysphagia after anti-reflux surgery and may support future personalized perioperative risk stratification and prospective multicenter validation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.