ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Functional connectivity gradients depend on cortical sampling position and brain state.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional-connectivity analyses often treat signals sampled from nearby cortical positions as interchangeable, despite anatomical and hemodynamic transitions at the gray-white boundary. We tested whether sampling position constitutes a state-sensitive dimension of macroscale functional organization. In 176 Human Connectome Project young adults with four 7 T resting-state and four movie-watching runs, BOLD time series were sampled from subject-specific midthickness and gray-white-boundary surfaces, summarized across 400 cortical parcels, and embedded in a common functional-gradient space. Movie viewing reduced principal-gradient separation between surfaces, but this effect was spatially heterogeneous: Visual, Limbic and Default networks converged, whereas Salience/ventral-attention cortex differentiated. Shapley decomposition and counterfactual analyses showed that the state change reflected coordinated reconfiguration of both surface representations rather than one surface approaching the other. Changes in the original connectivity profiles tracked gradient changes, indicating that the result was not solely introduced by embedding. Both surfaces also exhibited stimulus-locked intersubject functional connectivity during movies. However, stimulus-shared separation captured only part of movie-state organization and did not explain the movie-minus-rest change. Finally, in 172 matched participants, resting-state separation maps generalized from 7 T to 3 T, whereas absolute magnitude and cross-field individual ranking were less stable. These findings establish cortical sampling position as an interpretable measurement dimension of functional-connectivity geometry. Its spatial organization is reproducible across acquisitions, but its magnitude and state dependence vary, emphasizing that where BOLD signals are sampled relative to the cortical boundary can shape conclusions about macroscale brain organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.