Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42523452›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Computational Counterfactuals Reveal Non-Additive Audiovisual Semantics in Natural Movie Responses.

Muwei Li

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Muwei LiVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3596-9287

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural audiovisual perception may not be fully captured by decomposing movies into auditory and visual streams. I introduce a computational-counterfactual framework that keeps movie viewing intact while varying only AI-derived descriptions of the same clips. Using 7 Tesla movie fMRI imaging data from 176 participants, I tested whether cortical responses were better predicted by native audiovisual semantics than by a dimension-matched additive reconstruction from audio-only and video-only descriptions. The native model outperformed the matched additive baseline under content-aware purged cross-validation, with strongest gains in auditory, visual, and dorsal attention systems. Representational-similarity, feature-replacement, and content-gating analyses showed that the advantage reflected feature- and network-specific routing linked to coherent audiovisual semantic emergence rather than raw auditory-visual discrepancy. The effect survived stronger temporal purging and repeat-content exclusion, suggesting that intact movie viewing evokes cortical structure aligned with native audiovisual meaning beyond additive unimodal semantics.

Indexed as

Audiovisual IntegrationLLMMovie WatchingNaturalistic fMRISemantic Encoding

Identifiers

PMID42523452
PMCPMC13405347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.