ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
A personalized map of where, when, and how to stimulate the brain to elicit controlled responses.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain stimulation has transformed the treatment of several neurological and psychiatric disorders and is now widely used to read out causal interactions in the human brain. However, its effects vary from one trial to the next, even when the stimulation parameters are kept identical. Identifying the sources of this variability and developing new strategies to reduce it are key to achieving more controllable interventions. Yet, exhaustive testing in real experiments is unfeasible, because each participant can only be probed at a handful of sites under conditions the experimenter cannot fully control. Here we use personalized brain models to map how stimulation responses vary across target sites and with the brain's ongoing state. We show that stimulation responses are jointly determined by the target's position along the cortical unimodal-to-transmodal hierarchy and the brain's global ongoing activity, with lower-activity states yielding larger responses. Accordingly, timing stimulation to low-activity periods reduces trial-to-trial variability in response magnitude. Even without state information, joint stimulation of specific region pairs reduces variability compared with stimulating either region alone. Together, these findings identify where, when, and how to stimulate the brain to achieve more reproducible responses, with concrete predictions for closed-loop and circuit-level stimulation protocols.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.