ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Feedback between filament spacing, crosslinker binding, and self-organization in cytoskeletal bundles.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The lateral spacing between filaments in crosslinked cytoskeletal bundles is a critical yet poorly understood physical parameter that affects force generation, transport, and bundle architecture. We develop a biophysical model of crosslinkers and crosslinking motors on filament pairs. Motor/crosslinker binding sets the filament spacing, which in turn biases which motors/crosslinkers can bind. Crosslinking motors generate pulling forces that bring antiparallel filaments closer together, while non-motor crosslinkers with a preferred binding angle exert repulsive torques that maintain larger spacing. We demonstrate these principles in a model of the fission yeast anaphase mitotic spindle midzone, where microtubules form a square array with nearest-neighbor spacing 2-5 times smaller than the length of crosslinking proteins. Our model shows that motor-crosslinker interactions alone are sufficient to drive self-organization into this experimentally observed geometry. Furthermore, the feedback between geometry and binding creates strong indirect cooperativity, because crosslinkers establish spacing that favors binding of similar-length proteins, leading to history-dependent states that persist long after individual protein binding equilibration. This feedback mechanism in which crosslinkers control geometry and geometry controls crosslinker binding should operate in any multi-crosslinker-filament system and represents a general self-organizing principle for cytoskeletal networks.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.