ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Selective convergence and graded divergence of hippocampal and amygdala subregions using functional connectivity.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hippocampus and amygdala are neighboring medial temporal lobe structures linked to memory and affect, yet how their subregions are jointly embedded within distributed isocortical systems remains unclear. Using resting-state fMRI from 722 Human Connectome Project Young Adult participants, we mapped hippocampal and amygdalar subregions within a unified cortex-wide framework, quantifying subregion-to-cortex connectivity via Pearson correlation (broad co-fluctuation) and GLASSO partial correlation (relatively more direct functional association). We introduced two count-based metrics: dominance (relative hippocampal vs. amygdalar representation) and sharedness (balanced co-representation). Direct associations showed both structures sharing coupling with paralimbic areas and, more modestly, default mode regions, while broader co-fluctuations extended into somatomotor and paralimbic networks. Divergence patterns depended on the estimator: hippocampal subregions preferentially coupled with default-mode and visual networks under direct association, while amygdalar nuclei favored ventral attention and limbic networks; broader co-fluctuations additionally implicated somatomotor cortex for amygdala and visual cortex for hippocampus. These principles held at the subfield/nucleus level, varying along the hippocampal long axis and identifying the paralaminar nucleus as the most hippocampus-like amygdalar subregion. Data-driven connectivity gradients confirmed both systems' separation and fine-scale interdigitation. Hippocampal and amygdalar subregions are thus embedded in cortex not as discrete systems, but through structured, spatially organized co-representation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.