Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42523216›Full record

ArticleACI open2025

Agile User-Centered Design of a Clinical Research Project Management System in a Pediatric Health Institute.

Danny T Y Wu, Manhar Suharwardy, Aniruddhan Ramesh, Shubhra Gupta, Chen Xin, Ting Zhang, Ching-Tzu Tsai, Jenna Dawn, Michelle Faust, Adam Kushner

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACI open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Danny T Y WuDepartment of Biostatistics, Health Informatics and Data Sciences, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio, United States.
Manhar SuharwardyDepartment of Biostatistics, Health Informatics and Data Sciences, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio, United States.
Aniruddhan RameshDepartment of Biostatistics, Health Informatics and Data Sciences, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio, United States.
Shubhra GuptaDepartment of Biostatistics, Health Informatics and Data Sciences, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio, United States.
Chen XinDepartment of Biostatistics, Health Informatics and Data Sciences, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio, United States.
Ting ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, Health Informatics and Data Sciences, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio, United States.
Ching-Tzu TsaiDepartment of Biostatistics, Health Informatics and Data Sciences, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio, United States.
Jenna DawnHeart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.
Michelle FaustHeart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.
Adam KushnerHeart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Project management is crucial in academic hospitals due to the intensive involvement in research and clinical trials. Designing an application in a user-centered and workflow-compatible manner can prevent issues arising from hospital's limited resources and various risks (e.g., financial risk and ethical misconduct). Objectives: This study aimed to (1) develop a hybrid method combining user-centered design (UCD) and agile software development (ASD) principles, (2) apply the hybrid model to develop a Clinical Research Project Management System (CRPMS), (3) assess the usability of the CRPMS and iteratively refine the application. Materials and Methods: A CRPMS was developed following the UCD and ASD principles and supported by a research core in a pediatric heart institute. In Phase 0, semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand processes and bottlenecks. In Phase 1, the project management and budgeting sections of the CRPMS were simultaneously developed. In Phase 2, the Principal Investigator dashboard and the intake section of the CRPMS were developed. Usability evaluation metrics included the System Usability Scale (SUS), Single Ease Question, and severity scores. Results: In Phase 1, the average SUS score was 88.65. There were 126 usability issues and 68 were considered high severity due to the SUS score cutoff (>1.5). In Phase 2, the average SUS score was 87.1. All of the 71 usability issues were addressed during the iterative refinements. Conclusion: A workflow-compatible and highly user-friendly CRPMS was developed by employing a hybrid Agile UCD model. Future work includes continuing development and expanding the CRPMS within and outside the institute.

Indexed as

evaluationinterfaces and usabilityresearch planning and conductuser acceptance and resistanceworkflow

Identifiers

PMID42523216
PMCPMC13393553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.