ArticleACI open2025
Assessing a Digital Public Health Intervention: Survey Implementation and Analysis in Washington State Using an Address-Based Sample.
Article in ACI open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Pandemic Response to Kill the Clipboard: Patient-Controlled Sharing of Health Data Using International Patient Summary (IPS) and QR codes.Applied clinical informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In November 2021, the Washington State Department of Health launched WA Verify, a quick-response (QR) code-based tool that allows users to share their coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine status using a mobile phone. Objectives: This study aimed to gather an unbiased sample of Washington residents to collect information about their experiences and opinions on digital public health interventions, with a particular focus on WA Verify. Materials and Methods: The WA Verify evaluation team designed and implemented a statewide survey using an address-based sample to assess respondents' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding COVID-19, WA Verify, and technology. To facilitate comparisons with known characteristics of the Washington State population, the survey included questions also found in state and national surveys and the U.S. Census. Weights based on demographic characteristics were developed to allow for weighted analyses in the future. Results: The unweighted demographic distribution of respondents mostly matched that of the Washington State population, with the largest discrepancy in education; 58.9% of respondents reported having a four-year degree or higher versus 37.3% of the state population. Across race, education level, age and gender, there were differences in reported experiences with and views on requirements to provide vaccination verification and awareness and use of WA Verify. Conclusion: Despite differences in experiences and views on WA Verify, there is broad interest in the tool, suggesting opportunities to expand its adoption. Data and information gathered with this survey, conducted using an address-based sample, provide a strong foundation for further analyses to inform public health interventions, particularly informatics-focused projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.