ArticleAnnals of the Child Neurology Society2025
In children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, less task-related up-modulation of motor cortex during response inhibition.
Article in Annals of the Child Neurology Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reliability of short interval cortical inhibition in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to identify a quantitative, brain-based measure reflecting impaired response inhibition in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to evoke potentials in hand muscle during both a simple reaction time and a response inhibition task in 8-to-12-year-old children, 41 with ADHD (42% girls, 76% white, mean age 10.3 years) and 38 typically developing controls (53% girls, 74% white, mean age 9.8 years). We used mixed-model linear regressions of evoked potential amplitudes to compare motor cortex excitability at (1) task-onset ("START": 550 ms prior to action); (2) preparing-to-go ("GO": 150 ms prior to action); and (3) selecting-to-stop ("STOP": 150 ms after stop cue). We hypothesized that task-related up-modulation of motor cortex excitability (motor evoked potential amplitudes) would depend both on task (STOP > GO > START) and on diagnosis (controls > patients). Results: Motor cortex up-modulation was significantly greater for STOP trials than during GO or START. Children with ADHD had both worse response inhibition performance (longer stop-signal reaction times) and significantly less task effect on motor cortex up-modulation. The largest diagnostic difference in motor cortex activation occurred during STOP trials. Reduced up-modulation during stopping was also associated with higher parent-rated symptom severity. Interpretation: Our findings suggest that motor cortex up-modulation of excitability, assessed indirectly by TMS motor evoked potentials, reflects the cognitive load during response inhibition tasks and may be a quantitative, brain-based indicator of impaired response inhibition in children with ADHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.