Observational studyMicrobiology spectrum2026
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for tuberculosis diagnosis: enhanced performance and cost-effectiveness.
Observational study in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a promising tool for diagnosing challenging infections like tuberculosis (TB). However, previous studies largely focused on case-specific application of mNGS in TB diagnosis. Thus, we conducted a retrospective observational study to first systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance and cost-effectiveness of mNGS for TB diagnosis. We retrieved a total of 16,776 results of the seven TB diagnostic assays, including mNGS, tuberculosis IgG antibody, TB interferon-γ release assay (TB-IGRA), TB-DNA, Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert), culture, and acid-fast bacilli staining (AFS) from 3,757 participants with suspected TB infection at Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital from September 2021 to July 2024. Diagnostic metrics were compared against a composite reference standard. Microbial composition and a cost-utility analysis were performed. Among seven TB assays studied, the World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended assays AFS, culture, and Xpert, as well as TB-IGRA, were requested most frequently for TB diagnosis, whereas mNGS ranked last. mNGS demonstrated the highest specificity (100%), accuracy (72.3%), and area under the curve (AUC) (0.795). Its sensitivity in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and tissue was 71.0% and 72.7%, respectively. Sequential use of mNGS after initial WHO-recommended tests (Xpert/Culture/AFS) significantly improved diagnostic performance (sensitivity, 70.4%; AUC, 0.823). Microbial analysis associated IMPORTANCE: This study systematically assesses the diagnostic performance and cost utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for tuberculosis (TB) in a large real-world cohort of 3,757 suspected patients, comparing it against six conventional assays (tuberculosis IgG antibody, TB interferon-γ release assay, TB-DNA, Xpert, culture, and acid-fast bacilli staining). mNGS demonstrated the highest specificity (100%), accuracy (72.3%), and area under the curve (AUC) (0.795), with sensitivities of 71.0% in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and 72.7% in tissue. Notably, sequential use of mNGS after the World Health Organization-recommended tests significantly improved sensitivity to 70.4% and AUC to 0.823.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.