ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2026
Teaching Accurate Sex-related Biology: Approaches for More Socially Just Instruction.
Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hermaphrodite, Gonochorist, and More: Navigating the Complexities of Sex-Related Language in Biology.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Review
- Synthesizing Sex/es Across Scales and Lineages: Centering Plants, Algae, Fungi, Protists, and Modular Metazoans.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Article
- Centering Biodiversity: Integrating the Complexity of Sex Into a Developmental Biology Course.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current undergraduate biology education does not usually reflect what is known about the diversity of sex, reproduction, and sexual behavior across the diversity of life, nor does it commonly address the human-specific diversity of gender identity and sexual, romantic, and related orientations. Instead, research indicates many courses rely on oversimplifications and overgeneralizations of sex-related content, aligned with socially dominant narratives and norms. While these simplifications may seem like good starting points to facilitate learning, they can lead to multiple kinds of harm. These include creating confusion for students learning biology, limiting the questions biologists ask and how they interpret data, perpetuating scientific inaccuracies, and fostering public disbelief in more complex and accurate representations of sexual diversity. Moreover, for the increasing number of students whose lives do not align with these narratives, including those with queer genders and orientations, such oversimplifications in their courses can cause personal, interpersonal, and professional harm. In college, queer students are less likely to persist in STEM than their cisgender and heterosexual peers. In society, the broader impact of such oversimplifications gives credence to erroneous claims of "biological truth" being used to justify discriminatory laws and policies. Multiple groups of biology instructors, including some authors of this paper, have published recommendations for how to teach sex-related content in biology contexts more accurately and inclusively. However, putting these recommendations into practice can be challenging and there are few published examples of implementation. In this article we, a group of biology instructors and science education researchers who led a SICB 2026 education workshop on this topic, share how we have put these recommendations into practice in our own classrooms. We provide example activities, frameworks, and resources for readers to build from in their own teaching. Given that oversimplified biology is being invoked to strengthen harmful and discriminatory narratives in society, biologists have a heightened responsibility to teach contemporary and accurate sex-related content in their courses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.