ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2025
Telehealth for all: Rwanda's digital leap in sexual and reproductive healthcare access.
Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Rwanda, unsafe abortion contributes significantly to maternal mortality despite a legal framework permitting abortion under specific circumstances. Barriers to accessing safe abortion services persist, necessitating innovative solutions. This commentary describes the development and implementation of a telehealth tool for the provision of safe abortion care in Rwanda, driven by national ownership and youth engagement. Framed within a human rights-based approach to health equity, this initiative saw young Rwandan innovators create a cost-effective and context-fit digital solution through a hackathon modality. The hackathon process led to the transition of the telehealth tool, which was being piloted, from fragmented, informal communication channels into a secure platform that ensured data privacy, patient confidentiality and standardised clinical documentation. The new platform facilitates remote consultation between the patient, the midwife/nurse and the medical doctor, while providing support to healthcare providers. This initiative demonstrates the potential of leveraging local talents and the power of home-grown solutions in the area of digital technology to improve access to essential healthcare services, bridging the gap between rural primary care and specialised medical oversight. Ultimately, this contributes to the reduction of maternal morbidity and mortality in Rwanda. Moreover, the paper underscores the need for a continuous evaluation of telehealth effectiveness to ensure ethical, rights-based and legal alignment. The project's success underscores the importance of a needs-driven and people-centred approach, government ownership and the active role of young people as co-designers in developing and implementing sustainable digital health solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.