Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42522914›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS2026

Feasibility and Safety of Cross-Regional 5G-Enabled Remote Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: A Retrospective Case Series of 21 Patients.

Di Pan, Yong Gu, Dahong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Di PanZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yong GuThe First People's Hospital of Aksu Prefecture, Aksu, Xinjiang, China.
Dahong ZhangZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0047-3871

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo address surgical resource scarcity in remote areas, we assessed the feasibility, safety, network stability, and training impact of 5G-enabled remote robot assisted laparoscopic surgery.

methodsRetrospective analysis of 21 consecutive patients (Oct 2023-Sep 2025) undergoing remote surgery from Zhejiang to Xinjiang (3700 km) using the Toumai robot with a redundant 5G network. Primary endpoint was technical success; secondary endpoints included operative outcomes, complications, network metrics, and OSATS scores.

resultsTechnical success was 100%. Procedures included partial nephrectomy (8), cholecystectomy (4), hysterectomy (3), prostatectomy (2), colorectal resection (2), and liver segmentectomy (2). Mean operative time 158.5 ± 42.0 min, console time 91.7 ± 26.6 min, blood loss 69.8 ± 40.2 mL. Two minor complications occurred. Mean round-trip latency 37.7 ± 5.6 ms, no packet loss. OSATS improved from 64.6 ± 7.1 to 87.9 ± 4.6.

conclusionsWith redundant 5G and local backup, remote robotic surgery is feasible and safe and may facilitate training.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedChinaColorectal Surgical ProceduresFeasibility StudiesFemaleHepatectomyHumansHysterectomyMaleMiddle AgedNephrectomyOperative TimeProstatectomy5G‐enabled remote surgerycross‐regional healthcarelaparoscopic surgerynetwork performancerobotic surgerysurgical training

Identifiers

PMID42522914
PMCPMC13417746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.