ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2026
Mapping Distinct Oxygen-Binding Regimes in Single-Atom Alloys.
Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-atom alloys greatly expand the design space of heterogeneous catalysts, yet adsorbate binding on these materials often cannot be captured by a single universal principle. Here, we show that oxygen binding on single-atom alloys is instead governed by distinct adsorption regimes that arise from different physical origins. Using more than 1,000 density functional theory calculations, we combine interpretable machine learning with descriptor analysis to identify three governing mechanisms and define their domains of validity. Oxygen binding is controlled by the d-band center theory on early transition metal hosts, follows the ten-electron counting rule on late transition metal hosts, and is further modulated by coordination effects in a complementary structural regime. This regime-based framework explains why conventional global models fail to capture adsorption trends across chemically diverse alloys. By accounting for distinct physical regimes, it enables more reliable prediction of oxygen binding and supports high-throughput screening of single-atom alloys. Our results establish adsorption-regime mapping as a general strategy for interpretable catalyst discovery beyond single-descriptor approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.