ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2026
SIEVEseq: unified differential expression, variability, and skewness analyses using RNA-Seq data.
Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA-Seq data analysis is commonly biased towards detecting differentially expressed genes and insufficiently conveys the complexity of gene expression changes between biological conditions. This bias arises because discrete count models cannot fully and independently parameterize the mean, variance, and skewness of gene expression distributions. Therefore, a unified statistical framework that simultaneously tests differential expression, variability, and skewness is needed. We present SIEVEseq, a statistical methodology that provides such a framework. SIEVEseq embraces a compositional data analysis strategy to transform discrete RNA-Seq counts into continuous form with a distribution well-fitted by the skew-normal distribution. Both parametric and nonparametric simulations show that SIEVEseq better controls the false discovery rate and Type II error than existing differential expression methods. Analysis of the Mayo RNA-Seq dataset for Alzheimer's disease demonstrates that gene sets with significant differences in mean, variance, and skewness between control and disease groups strongly predict disease state. Furthermore, functional enrichment analysis indicates that relying solely on differentially expressed genes identifies only part of the biological spectrum, whereas incorporating genes with differential variability and skewness reveals additional disease-related aspects. Cross-data and cross-methodology validation suggest the detected biological signals are genuine. The SIEVEseq R package is available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/SIEVEseq.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.