ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Resampling-based evaluation of a 79-SNP panel for hybrid classification across generations: a case study in European lobster (Homarus gammarus).
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate detection of hybridization and introgression is critical not only for basic research, but also for fisheries management. In many species, however, hybrid ancestry is difficult to detect beyond the F1 generation, especially when based on limited genetic markers. In European waters, hybridization between the native Homarus gammarus and the introduced H. americanus poses a direct risk to the integrity of native stocks and effective fishery management, yet detection methods are often limited to morphological traits or first-generation hybrids. A set of 79 SNPs originally developed for population genetic analyzes in H. gammarus and subsequently applied to distinguish H. gammarus, H. americanus, and F1 individuals has shown promise, but its capacity to resolve later-generation backcrosses remains untested. Here, we evaluated this panel's performance under the allele-frequency distributions and marker properties observed in the empirical dataset it was based on, using individual-based resampling to generate genotypes with known ancestry proportions. We show that the panel retains discriminatory power for broad ancestry classes and early-generation hybrids, but with reduced accuracy for later-generation backcrosses and especially high uncertainty in distinguishing backcrosses toward H. gammarus from variation within the H. gammarus parental reference. These findings provide an assessment of hybrid classification performance for this specific panel and demonstrate the value of empirical resampling simulations for identifying both the utility and the limitations of existing marker panels in fisheries-relevant species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.