Trial reportDermatology online journal2026
Self-reported factors influencing adherence to oral psoriasis treatment.
Trial report in Dermatology online journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Psoriasis impairs quality of life, and treatment efficacy is limited by poor adherence. Although patients prefer oral therapies, adherence to oral medications can also be low. Objective: To examine factors influencing adherence to deucravacitinib, an oral selective tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor. Methods: Forty adults with plaque psoriasis were provided deucravacitinib 6 mg daily and an electronic monitoring dock that recorded dose events. Participants were randomized to standard monitoring or monitoring with electronic reminders. After study completion, participants were stratified into the most (top 20%, T20) and least (bottom 20%, B20) adherent groups. Short-answer qualitative interviews were conducted at study conclusion, and responses were grouped into themes based on content analysis. Results: Twenty-eight participants completed the study. Mean adherence was 98.6% ± 0.9% in T20 (n = 13) and 82.5% ± 10.7% in B20 (n = 6). All participants self-reported taking the medication as prescribed. The T20 participants reported understanding how deucravacitinib works and cited electronic reminders as helpful for adherence. The B20 most frequently relied on routine to help with adherence. Conclusion: Greater understanding of therapy and use of reminders were associated with higher adherence. Patients relying on routine may benefit from structured reminder systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42522509What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.