Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42522489›Full record

ArticleDermatology online journal2026

The doctor-patient communication gap: Reddit as a window into our patients' concerns.

Courtney A Chau, Nicholas Brownstone, John Koo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology online journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Courtney A ChauIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Nicholas BrownstoneKimberly and Eric J. Waldman Department of Dermatology, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA.
John KooDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Physician-patient communication may be limited by time, especially in dermatology, where providers often see a high-volume of patients. Awareness of common patient frustrations may prepare dermatologists to optimize healthcare visits. Objective: This study employs Reddit to characterize sentiment toward dermatologists to identify opportunities to improve patient-physician communication. Methods: We obtained sentiment scores (SSs) for the top 1000 posts in the "r/Psoriasis," "r/Eczema," and "r/TS_Withdrawal" subreddits using the Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner. Paragraphs containing dermatologist-related terms (DPs) and had negative SSs were extracted and reviewed by the authors to identify themes. Results: In all subreddits, DPs had negative mean SSs (mean SS, r/Eczema: -0.097; r/Psoriasis: -0.024; r/TS_Withdrawal: -0.062). Paragraphs without DPs had positive mean SSs (mean SS, r/Eczema: 0.032; r/Psoriasis: 0.012; r/TS_Withdrawal: 0.090). Differences between these paragraph types were significant (r/Eczema: Conclusion: Reddit may serve as a useful window into patient perceptions of dermatologic care that can inform dermatologists of common concerns, facilitating positive communication and improving the doctor-patient relationship in dermatology.

Indexed as

CommunicationPhysician-Patient RelationsDermatologyHumansPsoriasiseczemapsoriasisRedditrelationshiptopical steroid withdrawal

Identifiers

PMID42522489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.