ReviewDermatology online journal2026
Dermatomyositis: Dermoscopic features and a short review.
Review in Dermatology online journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dermoscopy has demonstrated utility in several connective tissue diseases. However, in dermatomyositis, it has been poorly studied for both cutaneous and nailfold involvement. Results: We report the cutaneous and nailfold dermoscopic features in 11 patients with dermatomyositis and compare them with previously published data. Methods: Key cutaneous findings included linear vessels with a uniform distribution, white scales observed in all 11 patients, structureless white areas in 9 patients, brown globules in 9 patients, and mottled brown pigmentation in 8 patients. Nailfold dermoscopy revealed dilated capillaries and avascular areas in all patients, architectural disorganization in 10 patients, tortuous vessels in 8 patients, hemorrhages in 7 patients, and megacapillaries in 2 patients. Few studies have described dermoscopic features in dermatomyositis, some of them being isolated case reports with incomplete and heterogeneous clinical data. The largest published series included 29 patients and described polymorphic cutaneous vascular patterns, predominantly sparse white scales, as well as nailfold megacapillaries and dilated capillaries, without reporting follicular structures, shapes, or colors. Conclusion: Larger studies are needed to more precisely identify the distinctive dermoscopic signs of dermatomyositis and to evaluate the potential of dermoscopy as a prognostic tool for disease activity and progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42522485What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.