Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42522418›Full record

ArticleVeterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association2026

Assessment of MR-Induced Heating Effects in Four Common Veterinary Implants at 1.5 and 3.0 T: A Phantom Study.

Manabu Kurihara, Taichi Kimura, Kenji Yodo, Shuhei Shibukawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manabu KuriharaMolecular Biomedical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2009-8232
Taichi KimuraSaito Animal Hospital Tomioka Medical Center, Tomioka, Gunma, Japan.
Kenji YodoSaito Animal Hospital Tomioka Medical Center, Tomioka, Gunma, Japan.
Shuhei ShibukawaFaculty of Health Science, Department of Radiological Technology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8638-7522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative evaluation of implant-related heating in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is well standardized in human medicine, whereas evidence in veterinary medicine remains scarce. To address this gap, we measured radiofrequency (RF)-induced heating of four used veterinary implants under controlled conditions on clinical 3.0 and 1.5 T MRI, using an American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) F2182-19e2-informed gel phantom manufactured to approximate a 10 kg dog. The test set comprised an identification microchip, a titanium alloy tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) plate, a stainless-steel TPLO plate, and an ameroid constrictor. Temperature-time data were acquired with fiber-optic probes, and temperature change was calculated relative to baseline for each replicate run. Maximum temperature rise and heating rate were derived at the run level, with heating rate estimated from the slope of the linear regression of ΔT over time. At 3.0 T, the mean maximum ΔT was 0.300°C for the titanium alloy TPLO plate, 0.300°C for the stainless-steel TPLO plate, 0.467°C for the ameroid constrictor, and 0.500°C for the microchip. At 1.5 T, the corresponding values were 0.067°C, 0.067°C, 0.100°C, and 0.200°C. All individual run-level maximum ΔT values remained ≤0.8°C. Heating rates were small in absolute magnitude, with the microchip ranking highest across field strengths. These findings indicate that, when appropriate imaging parameters are used, MRI-induced heating for the implants examined is unlikely to pose a clinical risk. Future work should broaden device coverage, evaluate off-center placements, vary B

Indexed as

Hot TemperatureMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhantoms, ImagingProstheses and ImplantsAnimalsDogsStainless SteelStainless Steelameroid constrictormagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)microchipradiofrequency (RF)‐induced implant heatingtibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO)‐plate

Identifiers

PMID42522418
PMCPMC13416799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.