ReviewJournal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society2026
Caregiving for Older Adults with Hypertension: A Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Caregiving for Older Adults with Hypertension: A Scoping Review.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BackgroundHypertension management is challenging older individuals who are at an increased risk of falls and treatment side effects.ObjectiveScoping review of scientific literature on challenges of caregiving for older adults with hypertension.MethodsWe followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Guidelines for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Open Science framework protocol registration number: DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/9U5PY. We used the Covidence platform for review management and searched eight public health databases including Ovid MEDLINE and others.ResultsWe identified 1,869 studies for title and abstract screening. Of these, 47 underwent full-text review, and 27 studies underwent full abstraction. Many studies (16/27) were observational, 10 tested interventions, and one was a secondary analysis of trial data. Two of 10 interventional trials focused on caregiver well-being; remainder focused on care recipient outcomes. Five of 16 observational studies examined caregiver well-being, one examined caregiving costs, and 10 studies focused on care recipient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.