SynthesisCancer medicine2026
A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis and Review of Intraoperative Radiotherapy in Colorectal Cancer: Examining Radiation Dosage, Long-Term Prognosis, and Treatment-Related Complications.
Synthesis in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe effect of device type and radiation dose in intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for colorectal cancer is not well established. To explore this, we reviewed studies reporting postoperative complications, disease-free survival, local control, and long-term survival in patients treated with non-implantable IORT techniques-IOERT, KV-IORT, and HDR-IORT. Most of the available evidence relates to IOERT or HDR-IORT, which is usually delivered at 15 Gy (range 10-20 Gy). The median dose for KV-IORT is typically 12.5 Gy.
methodsWe conducted a systematic search of literature through November 2023 to identify studies that compared non-implantable IORT with surgery alone or other treatment approaches (PROSPERO registration: CRD42024508349). Twenty-five studies involving 2664 patients met the inclusion criteria.
resultsPatients treated with non-implantable IORT tended to achieve better 5-year overall survival than those managed without it, with IOERT contributing most clearly to this difference. A similar pattern emerged for long-term local control, where IORT showed an advantage [OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.19-3.64]; studies of IOERT reported an even stronger effect [OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.07-4.65]. Importantly, the use of IORT did not correspond with higher rates of key postoperative complications, including anastomotic leakage, pelvic collections, wound problems, or bowel obstruction.
conclusionsOur results suggest that IORT may improve survival and local control for patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer, despite the heterogeneity among studies. Device-related and dose-related factors may also play a role and merit closer study, thus warranting closer examination in future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.