ArticleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2026
Percentile schedules to shape touchscreen response locations in cynomolgus macaques.
Article in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Percentile schedules to shape touchscreen response locations in cynomolgus macaques.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Variations in the location of emitted responses are often critical in defining functional outcomes. Percentile schedules evaluate responses dynamically and mathematically against a set criterion that must be met for reinforcement to occur. Across five experiments, percentile schedules differentially selected shorter or longer distances between emitted response locations and an invisible, arbitrary target location on a touchscreen, in the absence of any stimulus cues other than the differential reinforcement of each response. Experiment 1 selected responses that minimized distances from the target. Experiment 2 arranged percentile schedule contingencies that reinforced minimizing or maximizing (or did not differentially reinforce) distance. Experiment 3 reinforced horizontal and vertical deviations separately and with differential weightings. Experiment 4 changed whether deviations were to be maximized or minimized halfway through each session. Experiment 5 reinforced minimizing deviations to novel random locations. In summary, percentile schedule contingencies controlled emitted response locations relative to the target location. This method extends the use of percentile schedules to nonhuman primates and a touchscreen apparatus and demonstrates control of operant responding across a continuous two-dimensional plane, with broad relevance for shaping, the study of spatial dimensions of responding, and for evaluating the effects of other variables on spatial learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.