ArticleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2026
Conditional discrimination of electroencephalogram alpha amplitudes in humans.
Article in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Conditional discrimination of electroencephalogram alpha amplitudes in humans.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conditional discrimination of high and low alpha amplitudes of electroencephalogram by humans was demonstrated in the 1950s. Despite several attempts, the original finding was only replicated once, but discrimination accuracy in the replication was only slightly above chance level and confounds may have contributed to it. Potential confounds included a systematic difference in time to exceed thresholds for high and low amplitudes (i.e., temporal cue), unequal numbers of high- and low-amplitude trials, and short trial durations that allowed for correct choices in a preceding trial to serve as a cue for the next trial due to gradual shifts in alpha amplitude. In the current study, we modified the procedure for eliminating these confounds: Participants observed a bar motion corresponding to changes in alpha amplitude for a constant duration. The direction of the bar motion (up and down) was positively or negatively correlated with the amplitude depending on the trial, and the participant's task was to discriminate the two types of trials. Three of five evaluable participants (60%) showed alpha discrimination without the above confounds, and this success rate was similar to that reported in the original study. Thus, alpha discrimination appears to be a replicable phenomenon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.