ArticleEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2026
The Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool With Artificial Intelligence (START-AI) to Support Decision Making in Emergency Departments: Model Explainability and Feature Importance Analysis.
Article in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEvaluate the importance of specific variables contributing to a recently reported Artificial Intelligence (AI) prediction model called Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool with Artificial Intelligence (START-AI) to predict inpatient admission from the Emergency Department (ED).
methodsA model explainability analysis was undertaken using single-centre ED electronic medical record data over 2 years. The START-AI model, which comprises ensemble machine learning and a transformer-based algorithm to enhance the original START tool, was re-run with each feature added sequentially to the model until the full model was complete. Feature importance was calculated using feature permutation or change in area under receiver operator curve (AUROC) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analyses.
resultsThe original START tool alone had an AUROC of 0.78 (95% CI 0.77, 0.78) for prediction of inpatient admission, reaching an AUROC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.89, 0.90) after all features of the START-AI tool were added sequentially. Features associated with a stepwise increase in cumulative AUROC were triage comments, ED case history notes, any blood test result (in particular, lactate and C-reactive protein), and any CT order. Vital signs did not appear to be associated with stepwise increases in AUROC. Feature importance was highest for the presence of any blood test result, START score, and C-reactive protein with respect to overall model importance.
conclusionA model explainability analysis provided a clearer understanding of the sequential and relative importance of specific features within the START-AI model, informing how the tool can be further developed and deployed in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.