Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42522152›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2026

The Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool With Artificial Intelligence (START-AI) to Support Decision Making in Emergency Departments: Model Explainability and Feature Importance Analysis.

Michael Dinh, Elizabeth Corbett, Thuy Truc Ngo, Eliot Salmon, Saleem Ahmed Khan, Farhana Pethani, Nicholas Moore, Irena Koprinska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael DinhRPA Green Light Institute, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Elizabeth CorbettRPA Green Light Institute, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4168-1428
Thuy Truc NgoSchool of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Eliot SalmonRPA Green Light Institute, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6212-3898
Saleem Ahmed KhanDigital Health and Innovation, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Farhana PethaniDigital Health and Innovation, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicholas MooreMacarthur Clinic School, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Irena KoprinskaSchool of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvaluate the importance of specific variables contributing to a recently reported Artificial Intelligence (AI) prediction model called Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool with Artificial Intelligence (START-AI) to predict inpatient admission from the Emergency Department (ED).

methodsA model explainability analysis was undertaken using single-centre ED electronic medical record data over 2 years. The START-AI model, which comprises ensemble machine learning and a transformer-based algorithm to enhance the original START tool, was re-run with each feature added sequentially to the model until the full model was complete. Feature importance was calculated using feature permutation or change in area under receiver operator curve (AUROC) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analyses.

resultsThe original START tool alone had an AUROC of 0.78 (95% CI 0.77, 0.78) for prediction of inpatient admission, reaching an AUROC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.89, 0.90) after all features of the START-AI tool were added sequentially. Features associated with a stepwise increase in cumulative AUROC were triage comments, ED case history notes, any blood test result (in particular, lactate and C-reactive protein), and any CT order. Vital signs did not appear to be associated with stepwise increases in AUROC. Feature importance was highest for the presence of any blood test result, START score, and C-reactive protein with respect to overall model importance.

conclusionA model explainability analysis provided a clearer understanding of the sequential and relative importance of specific features within the START-AI model, informing how the tool can be further developed and deployed in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePatient AdmissionTriageEmergency Service, HospitalHumansRisk AssessmentROC Curveartificial intelligencedispositionemergencyexplainability

Identifiers

PMID42522152
PMCPMC13416010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.