ArticleThe American journal of hospice & palliative care2026
Private Equity Ownership in Hospice Care: A Systematic Review (2012-2026).
Article in The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hospice care is associated with improved end-of-life outcomes. Recent shifts in hospice utilization highlight several key trends. Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) (25%) have surpassed cancer (23%) as the leading primary diagnosis. Concurrently, industry ownership has transitioned from predominantly nonprofit to for-profit (70%) and private equity (PE) ownership has grown dramatically from 3% to 15%. To date, no study has synthesized evidence on PE ownership in hospice care. We conducted a systematic review of English-language, peer-reviewed studies published 2012-2026, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Of 630 screened articles, 114 underwent full-text review and 6 met inclusion criteria. All studies used national data; sample sizes ranged from 80 to 536 PE-owned hospices. Three studies examined PE prevalence and market trends; two assessed caregiver-reported care experiences, and one evaluated financial outcomes by PE ownership. The evidence regarding PE ownership of hospices remains limited. It highlights the increasing role of PE in hospice markets. It consistently found (across two studies) worse care experiences at PE-owned hospices vs nonprofit hospices, except for emotional and religious support which was similar across ownership type. The evidence suggests PE ownership is associated with complex, often worse patterns related to market structure, care experiences, and financial allocation. Additionally, it underscores the limited evidence base to inform policy development. Research is needed to examine associations between PE ownership and hospice care quality, both overall and among vulnerable populations. Research should clarify modifiable factors influencing hospice quality and better characterize evolving ownership structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.