Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42522109›Full record

ReviewImmunological reviews2026

Anti-Modified Protein Antibodies in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Pathogenic, Protective, or Passive Bystander?

Amber-Sarai F L Stalman, Diane van der Woude

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunological reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amber-Sarai F L StalmanDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6860-2573
Diane van der WoudeDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8121-5879

Funding

Dutch Research Council 09150172110053Horizon Europe 101136582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of anti-modified protein antibodies (AMPA) is a hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). AMPA recognize post-translationally modified proteins and are cross-reactive. AMPA include anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA), anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (anti-CarP), and anti-acetylated protein antibodies (AAPA). These autoantibodies can be detected years before disease onset and are associated with disease development and progression. Moreover, AMPA have been associated with genetic and environmental risk factors in RA, including human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles, smoking, and microbial exposure. Consequently, AMPA have been implicated in RA pathogenesis, yet their exact role remains unclear. ACPA may exert pathogenic, pro-inflammatory effects through immune complex formation, Fc gamma receptor binding on macrophages, complement activation, and increased neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation. Additionally, ACPA have been linked to bone loss and pain induction in mice. However, ACPA may also have protective effects through inhibition of NET release, increased NET clearance, and Fc gamma receptor binding on macrophages. These findings indicate that AMPA may have diverse functions in RA, with both pathogenic and protective effects, whereas some ACPA may not display functional activity. Further studies on AMPA characteristics and mechanisms underlying the pathogenic and protective effects may improve the understanding of the role of AMPA in RA.

Indexed as

Anti-Citrullinated Protein AntibodiesArthritis, RheumatoidAutoantibodiesAnimalsAutoantigensBystander EffectExtracellular TrapsHumansProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalReceptors, IgGAnti-Citrullinated Protein AntibodiesAutoantibodiesAutoantigensReceptors, IgGACPAautoantibodiespathogenesisrheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID42522109
PMCPMC13415788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.