ArticleAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2026
Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare Among Youth With Autism and ADHD: A Population-Based Study From Sweden.
Article in Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Youth with autism spectrum disorder or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may face barriers to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. Yet, data on preventive SRH service use remain limited, especially digital care. This population-based registry study investigated whether patterns of SRH service use differed by digital versus in-person care among 12-22-year-olds in Stockholm County (2018-2022). Among 454,405 youth (48.6% female; mean age 16 years), 11,850 were autistic, 31,144 had ADHD, and 9126 had both conditions; the majority of SRH contacts were in-person visits. ADHD youth had higher adjusted Odds Ratios [aOR] of in-person (females: 2.02 [95% CI, 1.93-2.11]; males, 1.46 [1.39-1.54]) and digital visits (females, 1.21 [1.14-1.29]; males, 1.26 [1.05-1.52]) than control peers. Autistic youth had lower aOR of in-person (females, 0.67 [0.63-0.72]; males, 0.45 [0.40-0.51]) and digital visits (females, 0.79 [0.71-0.89]; males, 0.79 [0.54-1.15]). Intensity of use (incidence rate ratios) was higher among ADHD youth but similar among autistic females compared with control peers. Autistic females were more likely to consult physicians but less likely to see midwives or use short-acting contraception. ADHD was associated with higher odds of all provider types, contraceptive methods, and abortion. In conclusion, ADHD youth engaged more and autistic youth less-particularly males-with SRH services than controls. Smaller relative digital than in-person differences suggest digital options might reduce access disparities. Similar intensity of use between autistic and control females suggests barriers may be entry to care, whereas high SRH use among ADHD youth challenges assumptions that low engagement drives risk outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.