ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2026
Hair Follicle Stem Cells: Emerging Physiology and Therapeutic Applications.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hair follicle stem cells (HFSCs) have been studied for their role in developmental biology, hair cycling and transplantation. However, recent research reframes the hair follicle as a heterogeneous regenerative ecosystem capable of responding to injury cues and contributing to tissue repair beyond trichology. Despite advances, our understanding of HFSC physiology and therapeutic applications remains fragmented. Many reviews fail to bridge the gap between mechanistic biology and translatable therapeutic modalities, often overlooking critical aspects such as stemness-preserving culture systems, biomaterial-assisted delivery, and the specific influence of distinct wound microenvironments on HFSC fate. This review aims to delineate the current landscape of HFSC research, synthesizing evidence for their therapeutic potential beyond hair regeneration and discussing translational bottlenecks. This study summarizes core physiological functions, including injury-driven re-epithelialization and melanocyte stem cell-coupled re-pigmentation. We synthesize evidence for HFSC-based therapies in acute/chronic wounds (including diabetic and venous ulcers), burns, vitiligo, and exploratory applications in diabetes and ocular reconstruction. Furthermore, we introduce strategies for stemness-preserving expansion, preconditioning, and bioengineering delivery systems. This review provides a reference for advancing HFSC-based therapies toward reproducible, clinically viable interventions by integrating physiological insights with engineering solutions to overcome current translational barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42521973What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.