ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Combining Static Stance and Dynamic Gait Personalization to Improve the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Finite-Element Models for Hallux Valgus Foot.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFinite element (FE) foot models are increasingly used to support clinical decision-making in hallux valgus (HV) surgery, yet most rely only on static standing simulations. Such calibration remains under-constrained, validating non-unique mechanical model parameters that fit static data but may fail to represent dynamic mechanics limiting clinical reliability. This study evaluated whether introducing dynamic gait loading and multi-metric validation improves parameter identifiability and increases patient-specific clinical validity.
methodsPrior to surgery, a patient with HV underwent plantar pressure and motion analysis in static and walking. Patient-specific model was developed by morphing a standard FE foot mesh to the CT geometry. Then, thirteen biomechanical foot parameters were varied by Latin Hypercube Sampling. The 160 static simulations obtained were evaluated against fourteen targets from static experimental data. Sets with < 5% mean static error were finally used in FE time-dependent dynamic gait simulation driven by patient data. Predictions were compared for bone motion, center-of-pressure path, and plantar pressures at three instants of the gait.
resultsStatic study produced 9.9% average error across all models (eight models < 5% error) while input values differed widely. Dynamic validation split these candidates: one set kept mean errors < 13% whereas others rose to 25%, with substantial discrepancies in forefoot loading and kinematics.
conclusionStatic plausibility does not guarantee dynamic validity. Dual loading combined with multi-metric validation proved to be essential to isolate physiologically coherent parameter sets. Resulting pipeline strengthens the credibility of HV digital twins for future clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42521963What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.